Bloomberg Is worried concerning the ‘Glut’ Of Animated points

The yr remains to be younger, however this Bloomberg piece by way of Kyle stock will have to be an end-of-the-year contender for 2016’s most in poor health-informed piece of animation business writing.

It’s now not simply the factual blunders, like describing Disney’s Moana as “another oceanic epic from Pixar” (which was once corrected after publication); it’s the author’s hard-line views on an industry that he hasn’t safely researched or taken the time to realise.

Stock wastes no time in revealing foolish views on animation when he starts the first sentence of the piece by suggesting that animated movies are for children. Later, to force residence the factor, he calls animation a “formulaic and saccharine style” with none justification, as if it’s assumed that every body else shares this bizarre view of animation.